Why I've ditched my smartphone for a dumb old Nokia

 

nokia ceo stupid

Rajeev Suri. Rajeev Suri (born 10 October ) is a Singaporean Indian business executive and the chief executive officer of Nokia. Before the current assignment in May , he was the CEO of Nokia Solutions and Networks from and held various positions in Nokia since Suri became the CEO of Nokia when the sale Alma mater: Manipal Institute of Technology, (B.E.). Stephen Elop, the man responsible for Nokia's Lumia devices at Microsoft and the Finnish firm's former CEO, is leaving Microsoft. Elop didn't elope, though. He and Microsoft boss Satya Nadella "have agreed that now is the right time for him to retire from Microsoft," Nadella says. It's part. Sep 28,  · Satya Nadella believes Nokia acquisition was stupid, buying LinkedIn $bn deal was ethical.


The 9 best and worst moments of Stephen Elop | TechRadar


This is not the place to promote your business. Any and every post promoting a business in any capacity will be removed. By posting here, nokia ceo stupid, you agree that you have no connections to the site of the articles you submitIf you do, we will instantly ban you. We do not allow 'blogspam'any post that looks like blogspam will be removed. Political submission are not allowed and will be removed.

This place should have a "business casual" feel. Like you're at a networking party If you link directly to video content you need to leave a comment, or state clearly in the title, nokia ceo stupid, what the video is about. Photography of the header licensed under CC. Risk pays off in business. Nokia ceo stupid averse businesses don't make wrong decisions, but they also don't innovate or lead their markets. As an industry leader in a rapidly developing high technology market, they consistently failed to acknowledge the need to innovate and remain agile enough to respond competitively to threats.

When those mistakes threatened to overwhelm them, they doubled down by becoming a second-rate partner with another company that was poorly positioned in the same market due to similar mistakes, and which had a reputation for taking merciless advantage of weaker partners. It's a strange definition of doing nothing wrong, to say nothing of historically inaccurate risk assessment. It wasn't really an innovation issue.

Nokia hardware included some standout features like their cameras, nokia ceo stupid. Many reviews of high end Nokia phones running Windows basically said, "This is a great phone and a great OS, but we need more apps, nokia ceo stupid.

Nokia made a big nokia ceo stupid by going all in on Windows Phone, nokia ceo stupid. However, it didn't so maybe they should have hedged their bets with an Android device. However, who nokia ceo stupid if that'd help? Elop's justification that the Android device market was so crowded that they couldn't really differentiate their product was a plausible concern. We already know that Android device manufacturers aren't making a lot of money and it's very plausible that, had they made Android devices, they'd be in a bad situation as well as they failed to stand out, while getting less subsidies along the way from Microsoft.

Maybe they were brilliant and realized their devices business was sinking so they made it as appealing of a buyout as possible rather than just trying to run it into the ground. By the time Elop came in it was already too late If they had gone android, they would have drowned on an overcrowded market with a terrible OS that required a big investment from them to customize to the level Samsung and others do to be competitive, nokia ceo stupid.

Instead, they went with the new kid on the block, knowing that it was a market they could easily dominate, and that would pay off nokia ceo stupid the OS skyrocketed, nokia ceo stupid. In the position they found themselves in, they made possibly the best choice possible: nokia ceo stupid by becoming the number 1 WP manufacturer, or win by becoming very attractive to purchase. I disagree. Back when they made the nokia ceo stupid with Nokia ceo stupid, the market was still anyone's to grab.

Choosing Android wouldn't have saved Nokia on its own but combined with a great marketing campaign, nokia ceo stupid, they could have potentially become what Nokia ceo stupid has become.

All the general public nokia ceo stupid in their phones is access to their apps and a recognisable brand. Leveraging Android's ecosystem would have put them on a level playing field app-wise, nokia ceo stupid. From there, they could have built a very successful marketing campaign on the enormous amount of goodwill that the public still had for Nokia. Maybe Nokia lacked the marketing chops to pull it off but I think in hindsight it was the best chance they had.

Tying themselves nokia ceo stupid a fledging 3rd platform did nothing but waste their brand recognition because by that stage nobody was willing to buy a phone that couldn't run their apps. They were innovating. It needed someone senior to say "Stop" and run with one solution and to deliver it. Elop was just a way for the useful bits to be transferred to Microsoft. He was foisted on Nokia by institutional investors who saw both Microsoft and Nokia languishing.

An iPhone competitor would have been a risk though. There was no indication at all data wise at the time that smartphones would be anything more than a niche market. People forget that when the iPhone came out there had already been a bunch of almost identical pieces of hardware that came out and each one of them utterly flopped.

Its like how Sony didn't see the iPod coming. MP3 players had existed before but they didn't make a dent in the Walkman due to their cost and niche tech nature, but they ended up killing the Walkman stone dead.

Sony did not figure out how to get the music, they created a proprietary format angering everybody. Creative tech players was ahead of Ipod, but they promoted pirating music to get it in mp3 format, which killed any chance for them in the US. Apple came up with a one stop shop, Itunes getting affordable content for its devices.

You're vastly underestimating how much commitment would be required to produce an iPhone competitor at that time, nokia ceo stupid. I worked in the mobile industry for 4 years, part of that time I worked for a well known phon manufacturer. Nokia brought out so many phones every year because they already had a template, other than the iPhone nokia ceo stupid was no template.

It was uncharted territory. Creating an iPhone competitor at the time would have been a large risk due to the huge cost of development and development time, and no one predicted they would become as dominating as they have done. You can't just knock out an iPhone competitor and still be risk adverse back when the first iPhone was released, that's a contracidtiction in terms.

The thing is, Nokia did have that project going since the mid s. It was a small team and it was showing very nice results. Shortly after the iPhone was out Nokia already had all of the groundwork laid for their own smartphone at this pointthe project nokia ceo stupid drastically scaled up and Intel came on board to jointly nokia ceo stupid new iterations of Meego OSbut bureaucracy and internal tension between Symbian and the smartphone effort took away critical time when Nokia should have been full bore on smartphones.

For reference, the first android phone wasn't released until a year after the s release. Old school corporate entrenchment and divisional infighting killed their smartphone initiative.

And to their credit they did bring in someone to put down the hammer and force everyone to work together on smartphones, but they brought in nokia ceo stupid wrong guy Elop a year too late, and he picked Windows Phone 7 and sold the mobile division for scrap to Microsoft nokia ceo stupid after.

I think you underestimate how much work it'd take to get that interface shown in your link to something competitive with an iPhone. There isn't a square centimeter of that picture that I can't spot something glaringly wrong with the interface that is specifically why these kinds of devices were failing to the iPhone.

The fact that many applications were just straight ports of Linux software meant that this was a computer that would run programs not optimized for touch, small screens, thumb keyboards, etc.

It looks like they just threw Debian on a Blackberry The iPhone was one of the nokia ceo stupid devices that really tailored the interface which is why it did so well. You missed something in your analysis. Symbian was a smartphone OS.

Actually, nokia ceo stupid, it was the only smartphone OS for some time, after its first launch in No they could not have done that and been risk averse. Not at the same time, nokia ceo stupid. Knocking out an iPhone competitor at the time would have required taking people away from currently profitable projects and putting together a huge development project, nokia ceo stupid. It would have taken a couple of years and involved thousands of RnD employees covering everything from chips, screens, casings, ux design and software.

The software they had at the time Symbian was not fully up to the task of a modern smartphone and would have required a massive reworking. The ux paradigm was completely new. It took HTC a couple of years to introduce a worthy competitor and that was because they were small enough not to have nokia ceo stupid risk market leading product lines to do it.

They were also the first to go all in with Android, which was brand new, untested, and very rough around the edges when it was brought into production a year or two after the iPhone. So Nokia would have had to completely slam on the brakes and reevaluate their development schedule for the next few years. They would have had to pretty much stop development on a number of very successful product lines and bank on the iPhone competitor holding up. They failed to see the future.

They believed their position as market leader was unassailable, nokia ceo stupid. This kills your business every time, nokia ceo stupid.

They didn't realize they were the leaders of a market that was about to cease to exist. Even Ericsson had seen the light years previously and partnered with Sony to refine their strategies into nokia ceo stupid smartphone space. You can see in ericsons history how they approached the smartphone market in a series of logical steps so when Android came onto the scene they were ready to use it and release some very good offerings. By the time they woke up to reality all their competitors had years of Smartphone RnD under their belts.

They made a run for it but bet on the wrong horse. Microsoft pretty much shanked them in the back with their takeover. Now finaly they have seen the light and are working on coming back to the market, but it will be as a massive underdog, something Nokia hasn't been for at least a century. It will be very interresting to see how the events of the last few years has changed them.

They released about 60 phones a year. They had the man power, the experience, the profits, the manufacturing, the suppliers, everything they needed. I know. And they would have had to take manpower away from those successfull product lines, nokia ceo stupid.

Of course they could have easily done it. But not at the same time as being risk averse. They were successful at the time. We have nokia ceo stupid benefit nokia ceo stupid hindsight, nokia ceo stupid. All they saw was that they had a number of wildly successful phones and a near unasailable domination of the market. Then an upstart that has never made phones before enters the market with the iPhone.

What they did wrong was to fail to see where the wind was blowing and betting on the wrong option.

 

Rajeev Suri - Wikipedia

 

nokia ceo stupid

 

Nokia needs to stop inventing stupid and start inventing better phones. This kind of magnitudes of stupid takes real creativity and diligence. Imagine if we could harness it for good. Rajeev Suri. Rajeev Suri (born 10 October ) is a Singaporean Indian business executive and the chief executive officer of Nokia. Before the current assignment in May , he was the CEO of Nokia Solutions and Networks from and held various positions in Nokia since Suri became the CEO of Nokia when the sale Alma mater: Manipal Institute of Technology, (B.E.). Stephen Elop, the man responsible for Nokia's Lumia devices at Microsoft and the Finnish firm's former CEO, is leaving Microsoft. Elop didn't elope, though. He and Microsoft boss Satya Nadella "have agreed that now is the right time for him to retire from Microsoft," Nadella says. It's part.